Avoiding Intent In A False Patent Marking Action

Team Contact: John Nemazi , Robert Tuttle

Brooks Kushman Patent attorneys, John Nemazi and Robert Tuttle discuss the recent increases in false patent marking cases and how to prevent your company from being sued.

Avoiding Intent In A False Patent Marking Action

The false marking statute, 35 U.S.C. § 292, which has been in place in its current form since 1952, imposes a fine of $500 per offense for falsely marking a product as “patented,” “patent applied for” or “patent pending.”

Historically, a single decision to mark a batch of products was treated as a single offense with a $500 penalty. But in Forest Group Inc. v. Bon Tool Co., 590 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2009), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit interpreted “offense” to be the sale of each individual article in the batch of products.

Read the entire Law360 article written by Patent attorneys John Nemazi & Robert Tuttle.

Original Publication: Law360 July 21, 2010

Keep Reading

Client Alerts

Final Rule on 2025 US Patent Fee Changes

Press Releases

Three Brooks Kushman Attorneys Named as DBusiness “Top Lawyers” for 2025

Client Alerts

Brooks Kushman Secures Federal Circuit Affirmance for Ford Motor Company in Patent Dispute, Upholding PTAB Rulings that the…

Press Releases

Brooks Kushman Ranked in the 2025 Best Law Firms List

Media Coverage

Brooks Kushman’s Christopher Smith Featured in Law360 Interview for 2024 Intellectual Property MVP Recognition

Blog

Four Years Later: The SEC’s Latest Round of Enforcement Actions Following the SolarWinds Breach

Client Alerts

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to Terminate After Final Consideration Pilot Program 2.0

Blog

From State to Global: Comparing U.S. State Laws to the EU’s Comprehensive Approach

Presentations

Brooks Kushman Shareholder, Isheeta Patel Laxmanan, to Speak at University of Michigan AIChE Chapter Luncheon

Press Releases

Brooks Kushman Attorneys Abdulai Rashid, Yasmeen Moradshahi and Cameron Anstess Passed the State Bar of Michigan

Press Releases

Christopher Smith Named to Law360’s MVPs of the Year for 2024

Blog

Navigating AI Compliance: How California’s AB 2013 Reshapes GenAI Operations