Headshot image of John Rondini

John P. Rondini

Co-Chair Cybersecurity | Patent Litigation | Post-Grant Proceedings

Michigan

(248) 226-2913

  • Overview
  • Representative Matters
  • Background
  • Featured Content
  • Insights
“My top priority is developing a strategy for any litigation matter that aligns with my clients' best interests and business plans.”

Industries

  • Electrical & Computer Technology
  • Automotive
  • Consumer Products
John Rondini is a multi-faceted attorney with extensive knowledge in litigation, negotiating settlements, and licensing agreements. John’s practice includes representing clients in patent prosecution, litigation, and cyber security and data privacy matters. In recognizing the pending threat of cyber-incidents his clients may face, John has worked to help develop Brook Kushman’s Cybersecurity and Data Privacy group. John’s experience includes assessing a client’s current cybersecurity and data privacy protocols and developing a comprehensive incident response plan to ensure compliance with applicable laws. John also assists his client’s in determining the potential root cause of a breach and what type of notification may be necessary. John also has experience in addressing information and data security requirements for his clients during both vendor contractual or M&A transactions. John has also represented client’s litigation matters at the district court and appellate level, as well as, before the International Trade Commission. John has actively managed each stage of litigation from pre-suit pleadings through trial, and through appeal. John has also represented his client’s needs in negotiating settlements and licensing agreements. While representing one client’s litigation needs, John became involved in developing and growing Brooks Kushman’s Post-Grant Proceedings team. As a result, John was part of a team that handled 25 inter partes review proceedings that invalidated hundreds of patent claims being asserted against that client. John has also managed the patent prosecution docket for clients that range from Fortune 500 companies to individual inventors. John’s prosecution experience includes handling a patent application from an initial draft through allowance. Relying on his litigation and prosecution experience, John’s has also handled numerous patentability and clearance opinions on behalf of his clients. Prior to joining Brooks Kushman, John worked for nearly ten years as a hardware design and software engineer in the automotive and semi-conductor industries. This work provided John with invaluable experience that helps him further counsel his client’s intellectual property needs.

Representative District Court/ITC Matters

Safe Driving Technologies, LLC v. Ford Motor Company (Patent Trial and Appeal Board): Served as Ford Motor Company’s litigation and Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) counsel, recently defended Ford in a patent infringement case filed by Safe Driving Technologies, LLC, which alleged Ford infringed four patents related to telematic safety features. Under Brooks Kushman’s direction, Ford filed Inter Partes Reviews (IPRs) against the four asserted patents. The PTAB ultimately held 43 claims unpatentable, with the plaintiff dedicating an additional 10 claims to the public. Brooks Kushman also represented Ford in the appeal, where the judgment was affirmed. Case No. 1:21-cv-00064

Smartrend Manufacturing Group, Inc. v. Opti-Luxx Inc. (Jury Trial – W.D. Michigan): On November 29, a jury in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan found that Opti-Luxx, Inc., willfully infringed two of our U.S. Patents on LED bus signs. The conclusion of this 2-year-long case against Opti-Luxx came with the jury’s unanimous verdict confirming that both of our client’s patents had been infringed, that Opti-Luxx willfully infringed those patents and that lost profits damages were owed to the client for infringement of the patents.

Ameranth, Inc. v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc. (Summary Judgment – S.D. California): Successfully defended Domino’s Pizza in a patent infringement suit relating to menu generation and synchronization of data for mobile devices. Obtained summary judgment of unpatentability on a patent asserted against Domino’s and 30 other parties. Also served as counsel for Covered Business Method proceedings where the Patent Trial and Appeal Board held three other asserted patents unpatentable. Case No. 3:11-cv-01810

In re Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles (ITC): Trial counsel for Ford Motor Company in multi-patent investigation directed to hybrid electric vehicles. Settlement after trial. Case No. 337-TA-1042

Ford Motor Company v. Paice LLC (PTAB): Represented Ford during the pendency of the 22 inter partes review proceedings challenging the validity of hundreds of claims across five separate patents. Managed proceedings through final written decision where the Patent Trial and Appeal Board held 273 patent claims were unpatentable. Case Nos. IPR2014-00571, IPR2014-00904, IPR2015-00722, IPR2015-00790

Paice LLC v. Ford Motor Company Representative (Federal Circuit): Successfully represented Ford in numerous appeals challenging the Patent Trial and Appeal Board decisions that had found hundreds of patent claims as being unpatentable. Case No. IPR2016-1412, IPR2016-1746, IPR2017-1387, IPR2017-1263

Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. Apple (Federal Circuit): Represented Ancora in successful appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversing district court’s claim construction ruling and affirming district’s court’s finding of no indefiniteness. Successfully briefed opposition to Apple’s petition for certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court. Case No. 2013-1414

Robert Bosch LLC v. Corea Autoparts Producing Corporation et al. (E.D. Michigan & ITC): In re Certain Wiper Blades, lnv: Lead trial counsel for Corea Autoparts (CAP) in multiple patent infringement actions concerning “bracket-less” or “beam” style wiper blades. Favorable settlement was reached prior to trial. Case No: 2:11-cv-14019; lnv. No. 337-TA-816

ElectroJet Technologies, Inc. v. STIHL Incorporated (E.D. Virginia): Representing Electrojet in patent lawsuit relating to engine timing control. Case No. 2:17-cv-00224

STIHL Incorporated et al v. ElectroJet Technologies, Inc. (PTAB): Defending Electrojet relating to inter partes review petitions filed by STIHL. Case No. IPR2018-00018, IPR2018-00020

Bose Corporation v. Lightspeed Aviation (Summary Judgment – D. Massachusetts): Represented Lightspeed Aviation relating to aviation noise cancelling headset technology. Managed litigation through summary judgment and negotiated settlement between Bose and Lightspeed. Case No. 1:09-cv-10222

HTC Corporation v. Ancora Technologies (PTAB): Lead counsel for Ancora in securing order from Patent Trial and Appeal Board denying institution of HTC’s covered business method (CBM) petition. Case No. CBM2017-00054

Ancora Technologies v. Apple (Settlement – N.D. California): Represented Ancora in patent infringement lawsuit relating to software security. Managed litigation through favorable settlement. Case No. 4:11-cv-06357

Education

J.D., University of Detroit Mercy School of Law, cum laude

B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Detroit Mercy, magna cum laude, Tau Beta Pi

Organizations & Affiliations

American Bar Association

State Bar of Michigan

American Intellectual Property Law Association

Michigan Intellectual Property Law Association

Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)

Michigan Inn of Courts

Federal Bar Association Eastern District of Michigan Chapter

Recognitions

“Rising Star,” Michigan Super Lawyers, Intellectual Property, 2013 – 2018

Industries

  • Electrical & Computer Technology
  • Automotive
  • Consumer Products

Presentations

Moderator, “Masterclass: The Role of Trade Secrets”, Auto IP USA, IAM, May 2024

Presenter, “2020 Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Year in Review,” BK Hosted Webinar, February 2021

Co-Presenter, “PTAB Year in Review: New Designated Decisions and Procedures Impact AIA Trial Strategies,” BK Hosted Webinar, January 2021

Moderator, “The Opportunities and the Challenges for Data,” Auto IP Event, Intellectual Asset Management and Brooks Kushman P.C., September 2020

Co-Presenter, “Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Year in Review: Major Breaches, Changes in the Law, and Upcoming Trends,” BK Hosted Webinar, February 2020

Co-Presenter, “PTAB Year in Review – Designated Decisions, Constitutional Challenges, and AIA Procedures,” BK Hosted Webinar, February 2020

Co-Presenter, “The Importance of Cybersecurity During a Merger & Acquisition Transaction,” Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Podcast, January 2020

Co-Presenter, “Cyber Insurance 101: What It Is And Why You Need It,” Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Podcast, November 2019

Co-Presenter, “Managing High-Stakes IP Litigation,” BK Webinar, September 2019

Co-Presenter, “Getting IT and Inside Counsel on the Same Cyber Boat,” April 2019

Co-Presenter, “The Importance of an Information Security Policy,” Cybersecurity & Data Privacy Podcast, April 2019

Co-Presenter, “Legal Trends in Cybersecurity & Data Privacy for Business,” Automation Alley Tech Takeover, April 2019

Co-Presenter, “2017 IP Litigation and PTAB Year in Review,” BK Webinar, February 2018

Publications

Author, “Understanding the Global Impact of the European Artificial Intelligence Act,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, October 2024

Author, “Navigating AI Compliance: How California’s AB 2013 Reshapes GenAI Operations,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, October 2024

Co-Author, “The USPTO’s Proposed Rule on Terminal Disclaimers: A Change from the Status Quo,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, August 2024

Author, “Where did you get that information? The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, May 2024

Author, “Utah’s Artificial Intelligence Act swings into full-force May 1st,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, April 2024

Author, “Artistic Freedom” v. Trademark Protection: MSCHF’s First Amendment defense face-plants on appeal,” Brooks Kushman Trending IP Blog, February 2024

Co-Author, “Current Lighting Wins at Patent Trial and Appeal Board,” Brooks Kushman Client Alerts, October 2023

Author, “CCPA Regulations Now in Full Effect,” Client Alert, August 2020

Author, “Michigan Auto Dealerships Are at Risk of Cyber Attacks During the COVID-19 Crisis—Here’s How to Combat Against the Threats,” Thomas Reuters Westlaw®, April 2020

Author, “Zoom’s Recent Headlines Illustrate Why Privacy and Security are a Critical Element in Product Design,” Blog Post, April 2020

Author, “Limit Cybersecurity Risks When Employees Work From Home Due to COVID-19,” Blog Post, March 2020

Author, “New Federal Legislation Seeks To Appoint A Cybersecurity Coordinator For Each State”, Blog Post, January 2020

Co-Author, “ChargePoint Seeks Supreme Court Review of Patent Ineligibility Ruling in ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc. Litigation,” Blog Post, October 2019

Author, “Preparing For A Potential Breach – Tips For Creating An Incident Response Plan,” Blog Post, April 2019

Co-Author, “PTAB Designates Two New Informative Decisions Addressing Its Discretion to Deny Review under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) Based on Prior Examination,” Client Alert, March 2018

Co-Author, “Supreme Court to Insider Availability of Extraterritorial Patent Infringement Damages,” Client Alert, January, 2018.

Co-Author, “PTAB Confirms Viability of Priority-Based Challenges,” Law360, February, 2014

Co-Author, “How to sell and license post-Quanta,” Managing IP, January, 2010

Insights

Client Alerts

Brooks Kushman Secures Federal Circuit Affirmance for Ford Motor Company in Patent Dispute, Upholding PTAB Rulings that the Asserted Automobile Safety Patents are Unpatentable

Read More

Blog

Four Years Later: The SEC’s Latest Round of Enforcement Actions Following the SolarWinds Breach

Read More

Blog

From State to Global: Comparing U.S. State Laws to the EU’s Comprehensive Approach

Read More

Blog

Navigating AI Compliance: How California’s AB 2013 Reshapes GenAI Operations

Read More

Blog

Understanding the Global Impact of the European Artificial Intelligence Act

Read More

Blog

The USPTO’s Proposed Rule on Terminal Disclaimers: A Change from the Status Quo

Read More

Blog

Where did you get that information? The Generative AI Copyright Disclosure Act of 2024

Read More

Presentations

Rachel Smith and John Rondini as Moderators for Upcoming Auto IP Event

Read More

Blog

Utah’s Artificial Intelligence Act swings into full-force May 1st

Read More

Blog

“Artistic Freedom” v. Trademark Protection: MSCHF’s First Amendment defense face-plants on appeal

Read More

Client Alerts

Current Lighting Wins at Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Read More

Blog

Arthrex Confirms the Director’s Authority to Take Control of a PTAB Proceeding

Read More

Webinar

Cybersecurity Insights and Trends for Small Businesses

Read More

Client Alerts

Virginia Becomes Second State to Enact Comprehensive Data Protection Law

Read More

Webinar

2020 Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Year in Review

Read More

Webinar

PTAB Year in Review: New Designated Decisions and Procedures Impact AIA Trial Strategies

Read More

Blog

With Threats of Ransomware Attacks Growing in Healthcare Sector, Victims Face Sanctions Risks from Paying Ransom

Read More

Blog

California Residents Are Preparing To Vote On A New and Expanded Data Privacy Law

Read More

Client Alerts

CCPA Final Regulations Now In Full Effect

Read More

Publications

Brooks Kushman Shareholder John Rondini Published in Thomson Reuters Westlaw® Expert Analysis Publication

Read More

Blog

Michigan Auto Dealerships Are at Risk of Cyber Attacks During the COVID-19 Crisis—Here’s How to Combat Against the Threats

Read More

Blog

Zoom’s Recent Headlines Illustrate Why Privacy and Security are a Critical Element in Product Design

Read More

Blog

Limit Cybersecurity Risks When Employees Work From Home Due to COVID-19

Read More

Client Alerts

First Data Breach Lawsuit Filed Based On California Consumer Privacy Act

Read More

Webinar

Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Year in Review: Major Breaches, Changes in the Law, and Upcoming Trends

Read More

Blog

New Federal Legislation Seeks To Appoint A Cybersecurity Coordinator For Each State

Read More

Webinar

PTAB Year in Review – Designated Decisions, Constitutional Challenges, and AIA Procedures

Read More

Blog

ChargePoint Seeks Supreme Court Review of Patent Ineligibility Ruling in ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc. Litigation

Read More

Publications

The Countdown Begins on California’s “Internet of Things” Law

Read More

Press Releases

Brooks Kushman Shareholder John Rondini Invited to Join Board of Michigan IP Inn of Court

Read More

Webinar

Technology Licensing Basics – What You Need to Know

Read More

Webinar

Managing High-Stakes IP Litigation

Read More

Blog

Return Mail Inc. v. U.S. Postal Service

Read More

Publications

Preparing for a potential breach – Tips for creating an Incident Response Plan

Read More

Blog

Assignor Estoppel Inapplicable to IPR Proceedings

Read More

Client Alerts

USPTO Adopts Federal Court Claim Construction Standard For All AIA Post Grant Proceedings

Read More

Press Releases

Twelve Brooks Kushman Lawyers Named To 2018 Super Lawyers List; Eight Attorneys Honored as Rising Stars

Read More

Client Alerts

Federal Circuit Clarifies IPR Procedures In Trio Of Cases

Read More

Client Alerts

Federal Circuit Tackles Post-SAS Procedural Tangles – Rules That Patent Owner May Request Remand, Did Not Waive Challenge to Partial Final Written Decision

Read More

Webinar

IP Provisions Made Simple

Read More

Webinar

SAS And Oil States: How New Supreme Court Rulings Will Change Post-Grant Strategy

Read More

Webinar

When Business Meets IP: Six Strategies for Mitigating Risk of IP

Read More

Client Alerts

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of IPR Proceedings, But Strikes Down Partial PTAB Final Written Decisions

Read More

Client Alerts

PTAB Designates Two New Informative Decisions Addressing Its Discretion to Deny Review under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) Based on Prior Examination

Read More

Webinar

PTAB and IP Litigation 2017 Year in Review

Read More

Client Alerts

Supreme Court to Consider Availability of Extraterritorial Patent Infringement Damages

Read More

Blog

PTAB Appoints Two New Informative Decisions Addressing IPR Filing Issues

Read More

Client Alerts

Federal Circuit Rejects Some USPTO Requirements for Amending Claims During IPR Proceedings

Read More

Press Releases

Twelve Brooks Kushman Lawyers Named To 2017 Super Lawyers List; Ten Attorneys Honored As Rising Stars

Read More

Client Alerts

Statements Made in IPR Preliminary Responses

Read More

Client Alerts

Supreme Court Limits Design Patent Damages, Vacates Apple’s $399 Million Award Against Samsung

Read More

Press Releases

Eight Brooks Kushman Lawyers Named To 2016 Super Lawyers List; Eight Attorneys Honored As Rising Stars

Read More

Client Alerts

Federal Circuit Rules That PTAB May Base AIA Trial Decision on Facts Outside Petition for Review

Read More

Client Alerts

USPTO Issues Scaled-Down Revised Rules For PTAB Trials

Read More

Media Coverage

Ford Wins More Hybrid Vehicle Patent Appeal Board Reviews- Brooks Kushman

Read More

Media Coverage

Brooks Kushman IP Litigation team mentioned in Law360

Read More

Press Releases

Fifteen Brooks Kushman Attorneys Named 2015 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

Read More

Press Releases

Brooks Kushman Named One of the Most Active Firms at the PTAB During the First Half of 2015

Read More

Press Releases

Sixteen Brooks Kushman Attorneys Named 2014 Super Lawyers and Rising Stars

Read More

Publications

Murphy and Rondini Review Liberty Mutual Covered Business Method Cases in Law360 Article

Read More

Media Coverage

Four Brooks Kushman Lawyers Named to 2013 Super Lawyers List; Ten Attorneys Honored as Rising Stars

Read More

Publications

How to Sell and License Post-Quanta

Read More