When developing new products, Brooks Kushman can assist in locating white spaces in the patent landscape to aid its clients in identifying new technical concepts that may be advantageous for new technological development. Our attorneys can assess existing technologies and develop a patent map to outline the participants in the current market and evaluate their patent coverage. Similarly, we are able to identify technology areas that your competitors are obtaining patent protection for which may be indicative of where your competitors are heading to with respect to their technological road map.
Brooks Kushman also routinely engages in patent clearance related activities for new products that are being developed to identify problematic patents to mitigate intellectual property risks. In many cases, when a product has already entered into the marketplace, it may be too late to engage in work-around solutions with respect to competitor’s patents. By partnering with us early in the development process, we are able to identify problematic patents and also provide design around options in a manner that fits within your product development cycle to give you the confidence you need that your product may be free of patent infringement controversies.
If the product has been developed and is being sold marketplace, we can also assess the relevance of an asserted patent(s) to the product to determine if the product infringes any of the claims of the asserted patents. If it’s not possible for a product and any proposed design around options to avoid the claims of a patent, Brooks Kushman also engages in invalidity searching to locate prior art references that have an earlier disclosure date than an asserted patent to invalidate the claims of an asserted patent.
In addition to understanding the technical factors involved with a product, Brooks Kushman has extensive experience in matters related to patents, including novelty, patent infringement, and validity issues. In our technical design practice, our patent services may include:
William Abbatt
Patent Prosecution & Patent Litigation
Michigan
Erin Bowles
Patent Prosecution & Post-Grant Proceedings
Michigan
Michael Brodbine
Executive Committee Member | Co-Chair Patent Prosecution
Michigan
Jason Burnette
Patent Prosecution & Litigation
Michigan
William Conger
Chemical Patent Prosecution & Post Grant Proceedings
Michigan
Tiffany Fidler, Ph.D.
Co-Chair Patent Prosecution
Michigan
James A. Kushman
Of Counsel | Emeritus Chairman
Michigan
Marc Lorelli
Co-Chair Litigation
Michigan
Stephanie Mansfield, Ph.D.
Biomedical and Mechanical Patent Prosecution
Michigan
James W. Proscia, Ph.D.
Applied Physics, Chemistry, Electrical, & Biotechnology Patent Prosecution
Nevada
Benjamin C. Stasa
Electrical, Computer, & Software Patent Prosecution
California
Mark Stuenkel
Mechanical/Electromechanical Patent Prosecution, Patent Portfolio Management, & Opinions
Michigan
Martin Sultana
Electrical & Software Patent Preparation/Prosecution, Patent Portfolio Management, & Technical Design Consulting
Michigan
David Syrowik
Electrical & Software Patent Prosecution & Patentability Opinions
Michigan
Michael Turner
Co-Chair Patent Prosecution
Michigan
Andrew Turner
Co-Chair Post-Grant Proceedings | Electrical & Mechanical Patent Prosecution, Opinions
Michigan